| Scientists
detail how the brain regulates sensory information
By Kim McDonald
June 13, 2002
An
unusual collaboration between physicists at the University of California,
San Diego and psychologists at Vanderbilt University has revealed
how the brains of higher animals and probably humans integrate sensory
information and motor control signals in way that allows us to heighten
our senses to smell a faint odor, visualize an individual in a crowd,
or even discern the sounds of a single instrument in an orchestra.
The scientists' findings about how the brain regulates sensory inputs
and motor outputs to accomplish those tasks are detailed in the
June 13 issue of the journal Neuron. Their discovery could have
a direct application to future efforts to help victims of stroke
or spinal injury with "neuroprosthetics" that might move
artificial limbs or other procedures that might lead to the reestablishment
of motor control in stroke victims.
According
to the researchers, how we filter out much of the of sensory inputs
we're not interested in to focus on a specific smell, taste or sound
is a consequence of the way the sensory and motor cortices of our
brain are hardwired to handle sensory inputs. This subconscious
mechanism enables us to immediately send motor signals to our eyes,
ears, nose and hands to enhance our perception of the sensory information
that we are interested in.
"The act
of sensation is inexplicably tied to that of motor control,"
says David Kleinfeld, a professor of physics at UCSD and one of
the leaders of the research collaboration. "If we spot a friend
in the distance, our eyes move to track him or her. If we caress
an object with our fingers, our hand moves to optimize the sense
of texture. If a new odor permeates a room, we sniff to sample and
identify the smell. In all of these processes, we separate the sensory
input from the motor component that directs and defines the sensation."
In their experiments,
the scientists discovered the specific mechanisms by which sensory
signals are converted into motor control signals. They relied on
an eclectic blend of physical and psychological tools to probe the
transformation of transient sensory inputs into a smooth motor control
signal for the position of the tactile whiskers on the snouts of
laboratory rats.
"A central
theme in sensory perception is how movement influences sensor information
processing," says Ford F. Ebner, a professor of psychology
and cell biology at Vanderbilt and the other leader of the research
team. "Our results show that the sensory cortex performs a
complicated extraction of information about what the whiskers touch,
while the motor cortex output moves the whiskers to actively synchronize
the rate at which the whiskers are being stimulated. This is thought
to be analogous to the fact that, during tactile object recognition,
people require their fingers to be actively moved over surfaces
of different roughness at a rate that is optimized by the motor
cortex."
The other researchers
involved in the study, financed by the National Institute of Mental
Health and the National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke,
were Lynne M. Merchant of UCSD, Robert N. S. Sachdev of Vanderbilt,
and Murray R. Jarvis of the California Institute of Technology.
The researchers
used the rat whisker system, known to scientists as the "vibrissa
sensorimotor system," because the normal motion of the whiskers,
or vibrissa, is a relatively simple back-and-forth rhythmic movement.
This allowed the scientists to apply a variety of experimental techniques
originally developed to study speech and other sound waves. What
they discovered was that the signal processing mechanisms between
the sensory and motor cortex of the rats extracted only the fundamental
part of the complex rhythmic sensory signals that entered the brain
so that the rats could optimize their sensory perception.
"This is
like the determination of pitch when members of an orchestra tune
their instruments," says Kleinfeld. "In the case of an
orchestra, a fundamental 'C' note is extracted from a mixture of
fundamental and harmonics produced by a bassoon. In the case of
the vibrissa system, this fundamental frequency may serve to synchronize
the motion of the vibrissa."
"Our results
may have applications in both biomedicine and robotics," he
adds. "As scientists and clinicians push to build neuroprosthetics
to control artificial limbs as an aid to victims of stroke or spinal
injury, it is essential to understand the nature of signal transformation
by the nervous system. This could one day allow researchers to formulate
control signals for the reestablishment of motor control in stroke
patients with sensory deficits. In addition, the signals we describe
teach us more about the general issue of how biology might solve
problems in engineering. Take bipedal walking for example. Humans
can accomplish this easily, but machines fail at all but the most
stereotypic versions of task. Experiments such as this one provide
additional clues to the solution of some of these computational
problems."
Kim McDonald
is the Director of Science Communications at the University of California,
San Diego
Ford
Ebner's online bio
Kleinfeld
Laboratory web page
|